PGXFF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.77M
USCUF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PGXFF vs USCUF

Header iconPGXFF vs USCUF Comparison
Open Charts PGXFF vs USCUFBanner chart's image
Prosper Gold
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization3.77M
US Copper
Price$0.07
Change-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Volume$168.25K
Capitalization5.08M
PGXFF vs USCUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PGXFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PGXFF vs. USCUF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGXFF is a Hold and USCUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (PGXFF: $0.05 vs. USCUF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: PGXFF and USCUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PGXFF: 66% vs. USCUF: 162%
Market capitalization -- PGXFF: $3.77M vs. USCUF: $5.08M
PGXFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $3.77M. USCUF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $5.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PGXFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUSCUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PGXFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • USCUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PGXFF and USCUF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PGXFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USCUF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PGXFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • USCUF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PGXFF and USCUF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PGXFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while USCUF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -14.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USCUF($5.08M) has a higher market cap than PGXFF($3.77M). USCUF YTD gains are higher at: 132.000 vs. PGXFF (-4.085). USCUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -527.34K vs. PGXFF (-3.33M). USCUF has more cash in the bank: 1.84M vs. PGXFF (701K). USCUF has less debt than PGXFF: USCUF (60K) vs PGXFF (90.1K). PGXFF (0) and USCUF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PGXFFUSCUFPGXFF / USCUF
Capitalization3.77M5.08M74%
EBITDA-3.33M-527.34K632%
Gain YTD-4.085132.000-3%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash701K1.84M38%
Total Debt90.1K60K150%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PGXFF vs USCUF: Fundamental Ratings
PGXFF
USCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10081
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8334
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5034

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PGXFF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USCUF (82). This means that PGXFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than USCUF’s over the last 12 months.

USCUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as PGXFF (100). This means that USCUF’s stock grew similarly to PGXFF’s over the last 12 months.

PGXFF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as USCUF (100). This means that PGXFF’s stock grew similarly to USCUF’s over the last 12 months.

USCUF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGXFF (83). This means that USCUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGXFF’s over the last 12 months.

USCUF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PGXFF (100). This means that USCUF’s stock grew similarly to PGXFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PGXFFUSCUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PGXFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
POR41.210.48
+1.18%
Portland General Electric Company
GLW53.040.45
+0.86%
Corning
GLBS1.170.01
+0.86%
Globus Maritime Limited
MFIC12.710.04
+0.32%
MidCap Financial Investment Corp
PINE14.59N/A
N/A
Alpine Income Property Trust

USCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that USCUF and MLXEF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that USCUF and MLXEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USCUF
1D Price
Change %
USCUF100%
-9.61%
MLXEF - USCUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMC - USCUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+11.44%
MMLTF - USCUF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLPNF - USCUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.62%
LGO - USCUF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More