Compare trend and price PINC vs VRNS
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PINC is a Hold and VRNS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PINC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVRNS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- PINC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- VRNS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PINC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRNS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PINC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- VRNS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
PINC (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.59% price change this week, while VRNS (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
PINC is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2024.
VRNS is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+2.21% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| PINC | VRNS | PINC / VRNS | |
| Capitalization | 2.58B | 5.15B | 50% |
| EBITDA | 374M | -72.02M | -519% |
| Gain YTD | -4.997 | -1.082 | 462% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.48 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.32B | 499M | 264% |
| Total Cash | 371M | 534M | 69% |
| Total Debt | 169M | 312M | 54% |
PINC | VRNS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 56 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PINC's Valuation (4) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is significantly better than the same rating for VRNS (79) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PINC’s stock grew significantly faster than VRNS’s over the last 12 months.
VRNS's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PINC (100) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that VRNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PINC’s over the last 12 months.
PINC's SMR Rating (81) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as VRNS (95) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PINC’s stock grew similarly to VRNS’s over the last 12 months.
VRNS's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as PINC (60) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that VRNS’s stock grew similarly to PINC’s over the last 12 months.
PINC's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as VRNS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PINC’s stock grew similarly to VRNS’s over the last 12 months.
| PINC | VRNS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 7 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 72% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NRGU | 648.64 | 13.63 | +2.15% |
| MicroSectors™ US Big Oil 3X Lvrgd ETN | |||
| FDWM | 21.53 | 0.28 | +1.34% |
| Fidelity Women's Leadership ETF | |||
| GII | 53.86 | 0.66 | +1.25% |
| SPDR® S&P Global Infrastructure ETF | |||
| FOVL | 59.84 | 0.24 | +0.40% |
| iShares Focused Value Factor ETF | |||
| YANG | 10.60 | -0.53 | -4.76% |
| Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X ETF | |||
PINC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PINC has been loosely correlated with GDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PINC jumps, then GDC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PINC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PINC | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| GDC - PINC | 44% Loosely correlated | -3.14% | ||
| QTWO - PINC | 40% Loosely correlated | +3.17% | ||
| ETWO - PINC | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.95% | ||
| SSNC - PINC | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| NCNO - PINC | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.75% | ||
More | ||||
VRNS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRNS has been loosely correlated with ASAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRNS jumps, then ASAN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VRNS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRNS | 100% | +1.73% | ||
| ASAN - VRNS | 53% Loosely correlated | +5.90% | ||
| TENB - VRNS | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| NOW - VRNS | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.63% | ||
| CRWD - VRNS | 50% Loosely correlated | +3.63% | ||
| COIN - VRNS | 50% Loosely correlated | +4.68% | ||
More | ||||