PLTYF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Updated
Apr 19 closing price
Capitalization
194.07K
SBHGF
Price
$40.86
Change
-$0.14 (-0.34%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
13.59B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PLTYF vs SBHGF

Header iconPLTYF vs SBHGF Comparison
Open Charts PLTYF vs SBHGFBanner chart's image
Plastec Technologies
Price$0.02
Change-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Volume$400
Capitalization194.07K
SBI Holdings
Price$40.86
Change-$0.14 (-0.34%)
Volume$371
Capitalization13.59B
PLTYF vs SBHGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SBHGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLTYF vs. SBHGF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLTYF is a Hold and SBHGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (PLTYF: $0.02 vs. SBHGF: $40.86)
Brand notoriety: PLTYF and SBHGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLTYF: 100% vs. SBHGF: 14%
Market capitalization -- PLTYF: $194.07K vs. SBHGF: $13.59B
PLTYF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $194.07K. SBHGF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $13.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLTYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBHGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PLTYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBHGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBHGF is a better buy in the long-term than PLTYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBHGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SBHGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

PLTYF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SBHGF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +2.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +90.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

PLTYF is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.92% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBHGF($13.6B) has a higher market cap than PLTYF($194K). SBHGF YTD gains are higher at: 63.892 vs. PLTYF (0.000). SBHGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 235B vs. PLTYF (-2.94M). SBHGF has more cash in the bank: 4.87T vs. PLTYF (97.4M). PLTYF has less debt than SBHGF: PLTYF (23.4M) vs SBHGF (5.12T). SBHGF has higher revenues than PLTYF: SBHGF (1.31T) vs PLTYF (0).
PLTYFSBHGFPLTYF / SBHGF
Capitalization194K13.6B0%
EBITDA-2.94M235B-0%
Gain YTD0.00063.892-
P/E RatioN/A11.67-
Revenue01.31T-
Total Cash97.4M4.87T0%
Total Debt23.4M5.12T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLTYF vs SBHGF: Fundamental Ratings
PLTYF
SBHGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2430
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10029
SMR RATING
1..100
8872
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7237
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3470
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBHGF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLTYF (92). This means that SBHGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLTYF’s over the last 12 months.

SBHGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLTYF (100). This means that SBHGF’s stock grew significantly faster than PLTYF’s over the last 12 months.

SBHGF's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as PLTYF (88). This means that SBHGF’s stock grew similarly to PLTYF’s over the last 12 months.

SBHGF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLTYF (72). This means that SBHGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLTYF’s over the last 12 months.

PLTYF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBHGF (70). This means that PLTYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBHGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLTYFSBHGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SBHGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UYM26.050.52
+2.02%
ProShares Ultra Materials
ITA198.271.43
+0.73%
iShares US Aerospace & Defense ETF
ENX8.950.06
+0.67%
Eaton Vance New York Municipal
FSCC27.270.15
+0.56%
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF
FDD15.96-0.02
-0.13%
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Income Fund

PLTYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLTYF and JWSMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLTYF and JWSMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLTYF
1D Price
Change %
PLTYF100%
N/A
JWSMF - PLTYF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FORL - PLTYF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRNW - PLTYF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBHGF - PLTYF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
SITS - PLTYF
3%
Poorly correlated
-7.41%
More

SBHGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBHGF and TBMC have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBHGF and TBMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBHGF
1D Price
Change %
SBHGF100%
-0.35%
TBMC - SBHGF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISRL - SBHGF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NETD - SBHGF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.00%
GIGGU - SBHGF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSSAF - SBHGF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More