PLTYF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Updated
Apr 19 closing price
Capitalization
194.07K
SBHGF
Price
$36.50
Change
+$0.28 (+0.77%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.36B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PLTYF vs SBHGF

Header iconPLTYF vs SBHGF Comparison
Open Charts PLTYF vs SBHGFBanner chart's image
Plastec Technologies
Price$0.02
Change-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Volume$400
Capitalization194.07K
SBI Holdings
Price$36.50
Change+$0.28 (+0.77%)
Volume$624
Capitalization10.36B
PLTYF vs SBHGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SBHGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLTYF vs. SBHGF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLTYF is a Hold and SBHGF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (PLTYF: $0.02 vs. SBHGF: $36.50)
Brand notoriety: PLTYF and SBHGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLTYF: 100% vs. SBHGF: 30%
Market capitalization -- PLTYF: $194.07K vs. SBHGF: $10.36B
PLTYF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $194.07K. SBHGF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $10.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLTYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBHGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PLTYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBHGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBHGF is a better buy in the long-term than PLTYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBHGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SBHGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

PLTYF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SBHGF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +4.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

PLTYF is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.49% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBHGF($10.4B) has a higher market cap than PLTYF($194K). SBHGF YTD gains are higher at: 46.410 vs. PLTYF (0.000). SBHGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 235B vs. PLTYF (-2.94M). SBHGF has more cash in the bank: 4.87T vs. PLTYF (97.4M). PLTYF has less debt than SBHGF: PLTYF (23.4M) vs SBHGF (5.12T). SBHGF has higher revenues than PLTYF: SBHGF (1.31T) vs PLTYF (0).
PLTYFSBHGFPLTYF / SBHGF
Capitalization194K10.4B0%
EBITDA-2.94M235B-0%
Gain YTD0.00046.410-
P/E RatioN/A10.21-
Revenue01.31T-
Total Cash97.4M4.87T0%
Total Debt23.4M5.12T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLTYF vs SBHGF: Fundamental Ratings
PLTYF
SBHGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5094
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10038
SMR RATING
1..100
8871
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3686
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
32n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBHGF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLTYF (92). This means that SBHGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLTYF’s over the last 12 months.

SBHGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLTYF (100). This means that SBHGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLTYF’s over the last 12 months.

SBHGF's SMR Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as PLTYF (88). This means that SBHGF’s stock grew similarly to PLTYF’s over the last 12 months.

SBHGF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLTYF (71). This means that SBHGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLTYF’s over the last 12 months.

PLTYF's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBHGF (86). This means that PLTYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBHGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLTYFSBHGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SBHGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MYD10.100.01
+0.10%
Blackrock Muniyield Fund
IDVZ29.350.01
+0.04%
Opal International Div Inc ETF
EDF5.12N/A
N/A
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund
XMMO129.62N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
AAPD16.86-0.07
-0.41%
Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares

PLTYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLTYF and JWSMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLTYF and JWSMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLTYF
1D Price
Change %
PLTYF100%
N/A
JWSMF - PLTYF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FORL - PLTYF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRNW - PLTYF
20%
Poorly correlated
-14.81%
SBHGF - PLTYF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
SITS - PLTYF
3%
Poorly correlated
-13.46%
More

SBHGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBHGF and TBMC have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBHGF and TBMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBHGF
1D Price
Change %
SBHGF100%
+0.77%
TBMC - SBHGF
19%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
ISRL - SBHGF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
NETD - SBHGF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
GIGGU - SBHGF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSSAF - SBHGF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More