PLYA vs SGHC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLYA is a Buy and SGHC is a Sell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PLYA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSGHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PLYA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SGHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PLYA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGHC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PLYA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SGHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PLYA (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +14.83% price change this week, while SGHC (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +31.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
PLYA is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
SGHC is expected to report earnings on Apr 09, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (+2.18% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
| PLYA | SGHC | PLYA / SGHC | |
| Capitalization | 1.32B | 1.66B | 80% |
| EBITDA | 256M | 166M | 154% |
| Gain YTD | 12.717 | 73.888 | 17% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.83 | 33.96 | 79% |
| Revenue | 978M | 1.41B | 70% |
| Total Cash | 273M | 245M | 111% |
| Total Debt | 1.07B | 26.2M | 4,084% |
PLYA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| PLYA | SGHC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 6 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 71% |
PLYA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLYA has been loosely correlated with VAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLYA jumps, then VAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLYA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLYA | 100% | -1.61% | ||
| VAC - PLYA | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| HGV - PLYA | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.82% | ||
| RRR - PLYA | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| MGM - PLYA | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| MCRI - PLYA | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
More | ||||
SGHC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGHC has been loosely correlated with RSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGHC jumps, then RSI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGHC | 100% | +0.38% | ||
| RSI - SGHC | 48% Loosely correlated | +4.40% | ||
| PLYA - SGHC | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| CHDN - SGHC | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| HGV - SGHC | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.82% | ||
| MCRI - SGHC | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
More | ||||