Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBJX vs WFDDX
PMBJX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts PMBJX vs WFDDX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$28.48
Change+$0.27 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets965.18M
PMBJX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBJX vs. WFDDX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBJX is a Buy and WFDDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBJX has more cash in the bank: 32.3B vs. WFDDX (965M). PMBJX pays higher dividends than WFDDX: PMBJX (0.06) vs WFDDX (0.00). PMBJX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: PMBJX (24 years) vs WFDDX (20 years). WFDDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than PMBJX (0.78). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBJX (10.50). PMBJX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: PMBJX (1000) vs WFDDX (1000000). PMBJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.26 vs. WFDDX (2.93). PMBJX return over 5 years is better than : 58.39 vs. WFDDX (-22.14).
| PMBJX | WFDDX | PMBJX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.14 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.17 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.057 | 2.742 | 257% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.3B | 965M | 3,347% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.26 | 2.93 | 521% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.79 | 33.27 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.39 | -22.14 | -264% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.46 | -18.91 | -531% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement