Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBJX vs WFDDX
PMBJX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts PMBJX vs WFDDX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$28.20
Change-$0.41 (-1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets948.11M
PMBJX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBJX vs. WFDDX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBJX is a Buy and WFDDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBJX has more cash in the bank: 32.6B vs. WFDDX (948M). PMBJX pays higher dividends than WFDDX: PMBJX (0.06) vs WFDDX (0.00). PMBJX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: PMBJX (24 years) vs WFDDX (20 years). WFDDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than PMBJX (0.78). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBJX (10.50). PMBJX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: PMBJX (1000) vs WFDDX (1000000). PMBJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.35 vs. WFDDX (3.21). PMBJX return over 5 years is better than : 49.87 vs. WFDDX (-26.73).
| PMBJX | WFDDX | PMBJX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.14 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.17 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.690 | 3.211 | 208% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.6B | 948M | 3,439% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.35 | 3.21 | 291% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.32 | 16.78 | 234% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.87 | -26.73 | -187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.02 | -19.18 | -501% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement