Ad is loading...
PMBJX vs WFDDX
PMBJX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts PMBJX vs WFDDX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$26.43
Change+$0.40 (+1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets904.88M
PMBJX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBJX vs. WFDDX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBJX is a Buy and WFDDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBJX has more cash in the bank: 30.2B vs. WFDDX (905M). PMBJX pays higher dividends than WFDDX: PMBJX (0.06) vs WFDDX (0.00). PMBJX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: PMBJX (24 years) vs WFDDX (20 years). WFDDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than PMBJX (0.78). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBJX (10.50). PMBJX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: PMBJX (1000) vs WFDDX (1000000). PMBJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.85 vs. WFDDX (-5.96). PMBJX return over 5 years is better than : 63.43 vs. WFDDX (-21.31).
| PMBJX | WFDDX | PMBJX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.14 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.17 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.054 | -6.097 | -17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.2B | 905M | 3,337% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.85 | -5.96 | -148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.88 | 26.73 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.43 | -21.31 | -298% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.34 | -24.83 | -352% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers