Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBPX vs WMGCX
PMBPX vs WMGCX Comparison
Open Charts PMBPX vs WMGCX
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth C
Price$18.21
Change-$0.08 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.03B
PMBPX vs WMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBPX vs. WMGCX commentary
Jul 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBPX is a Buy and WMGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 33.1B vs. WMGCX (5.03B). PMBPX pays higher dividends than WMGCX: PMBPX (0.01) vs WMGCX (0.00). PMBPX was incepted earlier than WMGCX: PMBPX (25 years) vs WMGCX (25 years). WMGCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). WMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGCX: PMBPX (0) vs WMGCX (1000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.94 vs. WMGCX (-2.14). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 53.06 vs. WMGCX (-33.05).
| PMBPX | WMGCX | PMBPX / WMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.79 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.98 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.076 | 6.523 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.1B | 5.03B | 658% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.94 | -2.14 | -511% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.47 | -16.02 | -253% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.06 | -33.05 | -161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.98 | -11.08 | -929% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement