Ad is loading...
PMBPX vs WMGCX
PMBPX vs WMGCX Comparison
Open Charts PMBPX vs WMGCX
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth C
Price$14.57
Change-$0.63 (-4.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.78B
PMBPX vs WMGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBPX vs. WMGCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBPX is a Buy and WMGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 28.5B vs. WMGCX (4.78B). PMBPX pays higher dividends than WMGCX: PMBPX (0.01) vs WMGCX (0.00). PMBPX was incepted earlier than WMGCX: PMBPX (24 years) vs WMGCX (25 years). WMGCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.84). WMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGCX: PMBPX (0) vs WMGCX (1000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.70 vs. WMGCX (-30.30). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 53.18 vs. WMGCX (-30.69).
| PMBPX | WMGCX | PMBPX / WMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.79 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.98 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.515 | -20.035 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.5B | 4.78B | 597% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.70 | -30.30 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.43 | -41.99 | -20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.18 | -30.69 | -173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.84 | -35.24 | -190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...