Ad is loading...
PMDRF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.06 (-40.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
SGLDF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

PMDRF vs SGLDF

Header iconPMDRF vs SGLDF Comparison
Open Charts PMDRF vs SGLDFBanner chart's image
SONORAN DESERT COPPER
Price$0.09
Change-$0.06 (-40.00%)
Volume$20K
CapitalizationN/A
Sabre Gold Mines
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20K
CapitalizationN/A
PMDRF vs SGLDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PMDRF vs. SGLDF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMDRF is a Hold and SGLDF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (PMDRF: $0.09 vs. SGLDF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: PMDRF and SGLDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PMDRF: 58% vs. SGLDF: 80%
Market capitalization -- PMDRF: $2.74M vs. SGLDF: $11.73M
PMDRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.74M. SGLDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $11.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PMDRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSGLDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PMDRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SGLDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGLDF is a better buy in the long-term than PMDRF.

Price Growth

PMDRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -40.00% price change this week, while SGLDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -3.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGLDF($11.7M) has a higher market cap than PMDRF($2.74M). SGLDF YTD gains are higher at: 44.023 vs. PMDRF (-28.797). PMDRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.81M vs. SGLDF (-2.04M). SGLDF has more cash in the bank: 813K vs. PMDRF (5.42K). PMDRF has less debt than SGLDF: PMDRF (1.11M) vs SGLDF (9.05M). PMDRF (0) and SGLDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PMDRFSGLDFPMDRF / SGLDF
Capitalization2.74M11.7M23%
EBITDA-1.81M-2.04M89%
Gain YTD-28.79744.023-65%
P/E RatioN/A12.26-
Revenue00-
Total Cash5.42K813K1%
Total Debt1.11M9.05M12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGLDF: Fundamental Ratings
SGLDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSIEX19.21-0.18
-0.93%
JPMorgan International Equity I
CFIMX151.03-1.43
-0.94%
Clipper
VIIIX483.77-6.41
-1.31%
Vanguard Institutional Index Instl Pl
GRLLX19.23-0.29
-1.49%
Goldman Sachs Enh Core EqFund-ClassR
GMEYX12.58-0.21
-1.64%
GuideStone Funds Impact Equity Instl

PMDRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMDRF has been loosely correlated with VITFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMDRF jumps, then VITFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMDRF
1D Price
Change %
PMDRF100%
-40.00%
VITFF - PMDRF
60%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SHGDF - PMDRF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
SGLDF - PMDRF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
MJGCF - PMDRF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEXGF - PMDRF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
More

SGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SGLDF and PMDRF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGLDF and PMDRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGLDF
1D Price
Change %
SGLDF100%
+0.60%
PMDRF - SGLDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-40.00%
VITFF - SGLDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LMEFF - SGLDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSVFF - SGLDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.66%
GGGOF - SGLDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More