PNFP
Price
$104.75
Change
-$1.29 (-1.22%)
Updated
Apr 1 closing price
Capitalization
6.62B
19 days until earnings call
UCB
Price
$27.71
Change
-$0.42 (-1.49%)
Updated
Apr 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.13B
20 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PNFP vs UCB

Header iconPNFP vs UCB Comparison
Open Charts PNFP vs UCBBanner chart's image
Pinnacle Financial Partners
Price$104.75
Change-$1.29 (-1.22%)
Volume$559.65K
Capitalization6.62B
United Community Banks
Price$27.71
Change-$0.42 (-1.49%)
Volume$2.8K
Capitalization3.13B
PNFP vs UCB Comparison Chart
Loading...
PNFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PNFP vs. UCB commentary
Apr 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNFP is a StrongBuy and UCB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 02, 2025
Stock price -- (PNFP: $104.75 vs. UCB: $28.13)
Brand notoriety: PNFP and UCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PNFP: 114% vs. UCB: 126%
Market capitalization -- PNFP: $6.62B vs. UCB: $3.13B
PNFP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $6.62B. UCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PNFP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUCB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PNFP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UCB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PNFP is a better buy in the long-term than UCB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PNFP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UCB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PNFP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UCB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PNFP and UCB are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PNFP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.94% price change this week, while UCB (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

PNFP is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2025.

UCB is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.77% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNFP($6.62B) has a higher market cap than UCB($3.13B). UCB has higher P/E ratio than PNFP: UCB (16.42) vs PNFP (11.70). PNFP YTD gains are higher at: -8.253 vs. UCB (-12.182). PNFP has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. UCB (201M). UCB has less debt than PNFP: UCB (325M) vs PNFP (2.56B). PNFP has higher revenues than UCB: PNFP (1.38B) vs UCB (872M).
PNFPUCBPNFP / UCB
Capitalization6.62B3.13B211%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.253-12.18268%
P/E Ratio11.7016.4271%
Revenue1.38B872M159%
Total Cash229M201M114%
Total Debt2.56B325M789%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PNFP vs UCB: Fundamental Ratings
PNFP
UCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2161
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3872
SMR RATING
1..100
1011
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5560
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1264
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UCB's Valuation (69) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (88). This means that UCB’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UCB (72). This means that PNFP’s stock grew somewhat faster than UCB’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's SMR Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UCB (11). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to UCB’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UCB (60). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to UCB’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UCB (64). This means that PNFP’s stock grew somewhat faster than UCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PNFPUCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PNFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VTHR247.801.04
+0.42%
Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF
IMTB43.390.15
+0.34%
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
BCDF27.960.08
+0.29%
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Dev ETF
COMT26.510.04
+0.15%
iShares GSCI Cmd Dyn Roll Stgy ETF
IAE6.10N/A
-0.08%
VOYA ASIA PACIFIC HIGH DIVIDEND EQUITY Income FUND

UCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UCB has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UCB jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UCB
1D Price
Change %
UCB100%
+1.19%
UBSI - UCB
91%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
ABCB - UCB
91%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
FFBC - UCB
91%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
FNB - UCB
90%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
HWC - UCB
90%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
More