Ad is loading...
PNOPX vs RGACX
PNOPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PNOPX vs RGACX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$117.66
Change+$0.29 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.23B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$69.84
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.57B
PNOPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNOPX vs. RGACX commentary
Mar 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNOPX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 287B vs. PNOPX (6.23B). PNOPX pays higher dividends than RGACX: PNOPX (0.47) vs RGACX (0.08). PNOPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PNOPX (35 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than PNOPX (0.87). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOPX (22.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: PNOPX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.66 vs. PNOPX (-3.17). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 47.01 vs. PNOPX (34.10).
| PNOPX | RGACX | PNOPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.94 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.94 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.896 | -2.987 | 130% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.23B | 287B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.08 | 590% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.17 | 2.66 | -119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.19 | 21.08 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.10 | 47.01 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.82 | 63.74 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...