PPYA vs SLAMF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPYA is a Hold and SLAMF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PPYA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLAMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PPYA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SLAMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PPYA’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLAMF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PPYA’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SLAMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
PPYA (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +6.19% price change this week, while SLAMF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
PPYA is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (-0.19% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| PPYA | SLAMF | PPYA / SLAMF | |
| Capitalization | 121M | 439M | 28% |
| EBITDA | -2.29M | -3.36M | 68% |
| Gain YTD | 6.667 | 0.176 | 3,783% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.34 | 65.00 | 30% |
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 2.92K | 3.34K | 87% |
| Total Debt | 2.34M | 10.2M | 23% |
| PPYA | SLAMF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 4% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 7% | 12 days ago 3% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 6% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 3% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 32% | 12 days ago 7% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 37% | N/A |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OMSCX | 22.81 | 0.21 | +0.93% |
| Invesco Main Street All Cap C | |||
| AOTAX | 28.47 | 0.25 | +0.89% |
| Virtus Emerging Markets Opps A | |||
| LAFRX | 19.26 | 0.12 | +0.63% |
| Lord Abbett Affiliated R3 | |||
| UPMMX | 20.07 | 0.11 | +0.55% |
| Victory Precious Metals & Minerals Cl A | |||
| BALSX | 9.65 | 0.05 | +0.52% |
| BlackRock U.S. Insights Lon/Shr Eq Inv A | |||
PPYA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PPYA has been loosely correlated with JWSMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PPYA jumps, then JWSMF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PPYA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPYA | 100% | +6.19% | ||
| JWSMF - PPYA | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SLAMF - PPYA | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
| ASUUF - PPYA | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AQUNU - PPYA | 28% Poorly correlated | +6.28% | ||
| RENEU - PPYA | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SLAMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLAMF has been loosely correlated with RCFAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLAMF jumps, then RCFAF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLAMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLAMF | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| RCFAF - SLAMF | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PPYA - SLAMF | 32% Poorly correlated | +6.19% | ||
| LGYV - SLAMF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NFSCF - SLAMF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PEGR - SLAMF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||