Ad is loading...
PRMSX vs RNWFX
PRMSX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts PRMSX vs RNWFX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock
Price$32.80
Change+$1.50 (+4.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.44B
American Funds New World R5
Price$74.56
Change+$3.88 (+5.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.68B
PRMSX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRMSX vs. RNWFX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRMSX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 55.7B vs. PRMSX (4.45B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than PRMSX: RNWFX (1.17) vs PRMSX (0.34). PRMSX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: PRMSX (30 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). PRMSX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). PRMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.10 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRMSX: RNWFX (250) vs PRMSX (2500). PRMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.97 vs. RNWFX (-10.19). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.34 vs. PRMSX (-12.74).
| PRMSX | RNWFX | PRMSX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.62 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.62 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.014 | -8.517 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.45B | 55.7B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 1.17 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.97 | -10.19 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.13 | -4.49 | 404% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.74 | 26.34 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.37 | 27.87 | -19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers