Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPDX vs RLBCX
PRPDX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PRPDX vs RLBCX
Permanent Portfolio Permanent A
Price$67.45
Change+$0.32 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.91B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$36.44
Change+$0.16 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.05B
PRPDX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPDX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jul 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPDX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 250B vs. PRPDX (4.91B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than PRPDX: RLBCX (1.63) vs PRPDX (0.62). PRPDX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PRPDX (9 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PRPDX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. PRPDX (22.14). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPDX: RLBCX (250) vs PRPDX (1000). PRPDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.42 vs. RLBCX (7.43). PRPDX return over 5 years is better than : 64.46 vs. RLBCX (38.71).
| PRPDX | RLBCX | PRPDX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.89 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.89 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.239 | 6.857 | 178% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.91B | 250B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 1.63 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.42 | 7.43 | 275% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.35 | 32.69 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.46 | 38.71 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.29 | - |