Ad is loading...
PRPS
Price
$1.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
TBCRF
Price
$5.54
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Ad is loading...

PRPS vs TBCRF

Header iconPRPS vs TBCRF Comparison
Open Charts PRPS vs TBCRFBanner chart's image
PROPELLUS
Price$1.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$828
CapitalizationN/A
Timbercreek Financial
Price$5.54
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$574
CapitalizationN/A
PRPS vs TBCRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PRPS vs. TBCRF commentary
Nov 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPS is a Hold and TBCRF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2024
Stock price -- (PRPS: $1.03 vs. TBCRF: $5.53)
Brand notoriety: PRPS and TBCRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PRPS: 122% vs. TBCRF: 22%
Market capitalization -- PRPS: $1.62M vs. TBCRF: $471.47M
PRPS [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1.62M. TBCRF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $471.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PRPS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTBCRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PRPS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TBCRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TBCRF is a better buy in the long-term than PRPS.

Price Growth

PRPS (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TBCRF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +1.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.42%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+1.64% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TBCRF($471M) has a higher market cap than PRPS($1.62M). TBCRF YTD gains are higher at: 17.267 vs. PRPS (-41.143). TBCRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 62.6M vs. PRPS (-1.65M). TBCRF has more cash in the bank: 1.3M vs. PRPS (424K). PRPS has less debt than TBCRF: PRPS (32.3K) vs TBCRF (527M). TBCRF has higher revenues than PRPS: TBCRF (165M) vs PRPS (3.03M).
PRPSTBCRFPRPS / TBCRF
Capitalization1.62M471M0%
EBITDA-1.65M62.6M-3%
Gain YTD-41.14317.267-238%
P/E RatioN/A10.54-
Revenue3.03M165M2%
Total Cash424K1.3M33%
Total Debt32.3K527M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRPS: Fundamental Ratings
PRPS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
19
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNTGF0.100.01
+15.07%
Centogene N.V.
JRNGF1.560.10
+6.78%
Journey Energy Inc.
DKILY11.910.21
+1.79%
Daikin Industries Ltd.
WJRYY17.87N/A
-0.01%
West Japan Railway Co.
DNKEY14.33-0.25
-1.71%
Danske Bank A/S

PRPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PRPS and VEL have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRPS and VEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRPS
1D Price
Change %
PRPS100%
N/A
VEL - PRPS
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
ASHTY - PRPS
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
QFIN - PRPS
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
TBCRF - PRPS
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
GHLD - PRPS
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
More

TBCRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TBCRF and ELEEF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TBCRF and ELEEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBCRF
1D Price
Change %
TBCRF100%
+1.48%
ELEEF - TBCRF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.31%
BRLGF - TBCRF
26%
Poorly correlated
+14.07%
FCMGF - TBCRF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALLY - TBCRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.67%
AXP - TBCRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
More