Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSCT vs SMH
PSCT vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts PSCT vs SMH
PSCT vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Annualized Return+43%
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSCT vs. SMH commentary
Aug 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSCT is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 68.1B vs. PSCT (496M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than PSCT: SMH (50.093) vs PSCT (40.658). PSCT was incepted earlier than SMH: PSCT (16 years) vs SMH (15 years). PSCT (0.29) has a lower expense ratio than SMH (0.35). PSCT has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| PSCT | SMH | PSCT / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 40.658 | 50.093 | 81% |
| Net Assets | 496M | 68.1B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.35 | 83% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 12.00 | 250% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.20 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PSCT | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Annualized Return+43%
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
PSCT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSCT has been closely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSCT jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSCT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSCT | 100% | +0.86% | ||
| BHE - PSCT | 79% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| POWI - PSCT | 79% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| CEVA - PSCT | 77% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| UCTT - PSCT | 75% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| AEIS - PSCT | 75% Closely correlated | +5.56% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| MU - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | -5.90% | ||
More | ||||