PTMN
Price
$17.40
Change
+$0.02 (+0.12%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
177.25M
18 days until earnings call
SLRC
Price
$17.65
Change
-$0.09 (-0.51%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
837.41M
2 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PTMN vs SLRC

Header iconPTMN vs SLRC Comparison
Open Charts PTMN vs SLRCBanner chart's image
Portman Ridge Finance
Price$17.40
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
Volume$73.8K
Capitalization177.25M
SLR Investment
Price$17.65
Change-$0.09 (-0.51%)
Volume$151K
Capitalization837.41M
PTMN vs SLRC Comparison Chart
Loading...
PTMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLRC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PTMN vs. SLRC commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PTMN is a Hold and SLRC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (PTMN: $17.40 vs. SLRC: $17.65)
Brand notoriety: PTMN and SLRC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PTMN: 198% vs. SLRC: 96%
Market capitalization -- PTMN: $177.25M vs. SLRC: $837.41M
PTMN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $177.25M. SLRC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $837.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PTMN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLRC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PTMN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SLRC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PTMN and SLRC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PTMN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLRC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PTMN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLRC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PTMN is a better buy in the short-term than SLRC.

Price Growth

PTMN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.52% price change this week, while SLRC (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

PTMN is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

SLRC is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.66% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLRC($837M) has a higher market cap than PTMN($177M). PTMN has higher P/E ratio than SLRC: PTMN (15.81) vs SLRC (10.84). SLRC YTD gains are higher at: 9.220 vs. PTMN (6.487). SLRC has more cash in the bank: 11.9M vs. PTMN (403K). PTMN has less debt than SLRC: PTMN (322M) vs SLRC (1.18B). SLRC has higher revenues than PTMN: SLRC (86.5M) vs PTMN (12.7M).
PTMNSLRCPTMN / SLRC
Capitalization177M837M21%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.4879.22070%
P/E Ratio15.8110.84146%
Revenue12.7M86.5M15%
Total Cash403K11.9M3%
Total Debt322M1.18B27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PTMN vs SLRC: Fundamental Ratings
PTMN
SLRC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4534
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4547
SMR RATING
1..100
7731
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5143
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
366
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PTMN's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLRC (91). This means that PTMN’s stock grew significantly faster than SLRC’s over the last 12 months.

PTMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SLRC (47). This means that PTMN’s stock grew similarly to SLRC’s over the last 12 months.

SLRC's SMR Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PTMN (77). This means that SLRC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PTMN’s over the last 12 months.

SLRC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as PTMN (51). This means that SLRC’s stock grew similarly to PTMN’s over the last 12 months.

PTMN's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLRC (66). This means that PTMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLRC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PTMNSLRC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PTMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLRC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DLHIX25.27-0.02
-0.08%
Macquarie Healthcare I
RIVDX17.28-0.05
-0.29%
American Funds International Vntg R-2
MLMAX21.70-0.31
-1.41%
Morgan Stanley Instl Global Core A
FISPX8.02-0.14
-1.72%
Federated Hermes Max-Cap Index IS
MSIGX59.90-1.10
-1.80%
Invesco Main Street A

PTMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PTMN has been loosely correlated with PFLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PTMN jumps, then PFLT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PTMN
1D Price
Change %
PTMN100%
+0.12%
PFLT - PTMN
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
NXDT - PTMN
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
ARCC - PTMN
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
MAIN - PTMN
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
SLRC - PTMN
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
More

SLRC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLRC has been loosely correlated with FSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLRC jumps, then FSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLRC
1D Price
Change %
SLRC100%
-0.51%
FSK - SLRC
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
ARCC - SLRC
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
BBDC - SLRC
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
CSWC - SLRC
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
NEWT - SLRC
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.71%
More