PVBC
Price
$11.24
Change
+$0.02 (+0.18%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
165.47M
76 days until earnings call
SBCF
Price
$24.92
Change
+$0.75 (+3.10%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
2.1B
76 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PVBC vs SBCF

Header iconPVBC vs SBCF Comparison
Open Charts PVBC vs SBCFBanner chart's image
Provident Ban
Price$11.24
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
Volume$19.96K
Capitalization165.47M
Seacoast Banking
Price$24.92
Change+$0.75 (+3.10%)
Volume$357.51K
Capitalization2.1B
PVBC vs SBCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
PVBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PVBC vs. SBCF commentary
May 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PVBC is a StrongBuy and SBCF is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2025
Stock price -- (PVBC: $11.24 vs. SBCF: $24.92)
Brand notoriety: PVBC and SBCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PVBC: 82% vs. SBCF: 73%
Market capitalization -- PVBC: $165.47M vs. SBCF: $2.1B
PVBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $165.47M. SBCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PVBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSBCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PVBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PVBC is a better buy in the long-term than SBCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PVBC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBCF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PVBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SBCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBCF is a better buy in the short-term than PVBC.

Price Growth

PVBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.55% price change this week, while SBCF (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

PVBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

SBCF is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.41% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBCF($2.1B) has a higher market cap than PVBC($165M). SBCF has higher P/E ratio than PVBC: SBCF (20.13) vs PVBC (14.20). PVBC YTD gains are higher at: -1.404 vs. SBCF (-8.835). PVBC has less debt than SBCF: PVBC (109M) vs SBCF (156M). SBCF has higher revenues than PVBC: SBCF (567M) vs PVBC (64.1M).
PVBCSBCFPVBC / SBCF
Capitalization165M2.1B8%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.404-8.83516%
P/E Ratio14.2020.1371%
Revenue64.1M567M11%
Total CashN/A168M-
Total Debt109M156M70%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PVBC vs SBCF: Fundamental Ratings
PVBC
SBCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2019
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7965
SMR RATING
1..100
199
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5558
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
657
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
47n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBCF's Valuation (62) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PVBC (78). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to PVBC’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PVBC (79). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to PVBC’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's SMR Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PVBC (19). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to PVBC’s over the last 12 months.

PVBC's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (58). This means that PVBC’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

PVBC's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBCF (57). This means that PVBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PVBCSBCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PVBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSGTX3.90N/A
N/A
Transamerica Small Cap Growth C
SCIIX7.07N/A
N/A
Virtus SGA International Growth A
TIQRX39.90N/A
N/A
Nuveen Equity Index R
WGFCX5.90N/A
N/A
Allspring Growth C
BRXCX14.12N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Intl Eq C

SBCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBCF has been closely correlated with ABCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBCF jumps, then ABCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBCF
1D Price
Change %
SBCF100%
+3.10%
ABCB - SBCF
93%
Closely correlated
+2.10%
UBSI - SBCF
91%
Closely correlated
+2.26%
UCB - SBCF
91%
Closely correlated
+2.14%
WSFS - SBCF
91%
Closely correlated
+2.08%
SSB - SBCF
91%
Closely correlated
+2.80%
More