PVGDF
Price
$0.16
Change
+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
7.2M
RBTK
Price
$2.10
Change
-$0.01 (-0.47%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
229.66M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PVGDF vs RBTK

Header iconPVGDF vs RBTK Comparison
Open Charts PVGDF vs RBTKBanner chart's image
Provenance Gold
Price$0.16
Change+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Volume$119.67K
Capitalization7.2M
Zhen Ding Resources
Price$2.10
Change-$0.01 (-0.47%)
Volume$100
Capitalization229.66M
PVGDF vs RBTK Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PVGDF vs. RBTK commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PVGDF is a Hold and RBTK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (PVGDF: $0.16 vs. RBTK: $2.10)
Brand notoriety: PVGDF and RBTK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PVGDF: 93% vs. RBTK: 5%
Market capitalization -- PVGDF: $7.2M vs. RBTK: $229.66M
PVGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $7.2M. RBTK’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $229.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PVGDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRBTK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PVGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RBTK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PVGDF is a better buy in the long-term than RBTK.

Price Growth

PVGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -11.68% price change this week, while RBTK (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.51% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBTK($230M) has a higher market cap than PVGDF($7.2M). RBTK YTD gains are higher at: -3.670 vs. PVGDF (-17.966). RBTK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -62.53K vs. PVGDF (-667.39K). PVGDF has more cash in the bank: 103K vs. RBTK (10.7K). PVGDF has less debt than RBTK: PVGDF (47.5K) vs RBTK (3.49M). PVGDF (0) and RBTK (0) have equivalent revenues.
PVGDFRBTKPVGDF / RBTK
Capitalization7.2M230M3%
EBITDA-667.39K-62.53K1,067%
Gain YTD-17.966-3.670490%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash103K10.7K963%
Total Debt47.5K3.49M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RBTK: Fundamental Ratings
RBTK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
13
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GENK4.260.25
+6.10%
GEN Restaurant Group
CBZ72.360.36
+0.50%
CBIZ
THRD5.270.02
+0.38%
Third Harmonic Bio
MATV6.49-0.04
-0.61%
Mativ Holdings
ULTA465.64-7.47
-1.58%
Ulta Beauty

PVGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PVGDF and AUCCF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PVGDF and AUCCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PVGDF
1D Price
Change %
PVGDF100%
+3.80%
AUCCF - PVGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUGG - PVGDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.04%
FYMNF - PVGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OCGSF - PVGDF
10%
Poorly correlated
+12.06%
RSNVF - PVGDF
9%
Poorly correlated
+12.93%
More