PWSC vs SWDAF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWSC is a Hold and SWDAF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PWSC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSWDAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- PWSC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SWDAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PWSC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- PWSC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
PWSC (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SWDAF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
PWSC is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+1.14% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| PWSC | SWDAF | PWSC / SWDAF | |
| Capitalization | 3.45B | 2.54B | 136% |
| EBITDA | 161M | 148M | 109% |
| Gain YTD | -3.183 | 3.388 | -94% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 1111.11 | - |
| Revenue | 698M | 963M | 72% |
| Total Cash | 39.1M | 437M | 9% |
| Total Debt | 838M | 285M | 294% |
SWDAF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| PWSC | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 62% |
PWSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWSC has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PWSC jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWSC | 100% | N/A | ||
| CLSK - PWSC | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| COIN - PWSC | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.98% | ||
| RIOT - PWSC | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.32% | ||
| INST - PWSC | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| RNG - PWSC | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
More | ||||
SWDAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SWDAF has been loosely correlated with SFSVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SWDAF jumps, then SFSVF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SWDAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWDAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SFSVF - SWDAF | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TMOAY - SWDAF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GAME - SWDAF | 25% Poorly correlated | +35.71% | ||
| PWSC - SWDAF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CRWRF - SWDAF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||