Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PWTYX vs RLBGX
PWTYX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts PWTYX vs RLBGX
UBS US Allocation P
Price$50.73
Change-$0.45 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets211.64M
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$35.65
Change-$0.31 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.39B
PWTYX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PWTYX vs. RLBGX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWTYX is a Buy and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. PWTYX (212M). RLBGX pays higher dividends than PWTYX: RLBGX (2.23) vs PWTYX (1.84). PWTYX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: PWTYX (32 years) vs RLBGX (16 years). PWTYX (0.77) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). PWTYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RLBGX (44.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PWTYX: RLBGX (250) vs PWTYX (2000000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.63 vs. PWTYX (0.37). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.35 vs. PWTYX (11.04).
| PWTYX | RLBGX | PWTYX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.25 | 308% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.25 | 308% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.396 | 4.592 | 9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 212M | 244B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.84 | 2.23 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.37 | 5.63 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.66 | 33.78 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.04 | 40.35 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.30 | 60.87 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement