Advertisement
PXCLF vs SRUUF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PXCLF is a Hold and SRUUF is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PXCLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSRUUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PXCLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SRUUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SRUUF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- SRUUF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PXCLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SRUUF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -3.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.58%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.30% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| PXCLF | SRUUF | PXCLF / SRUUF | |
| Capitalization | 40.2M | 3.07B | 1% |
| EBITDA | -955.9K | -28.64M | 3% |
| Gain YTD | 16.727 | -9.896 | -169% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 15.90 | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 13.1M | 20.5M | 64% |
| Total Debt | 0 | N/A | - |
PXCLF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| SRUUF | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IIGD | 24.42 | 0.07 | +0.29% |
| Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF | |||
| AGZD | 22.36 | 0.05 | +0.22% |
| WisdomTree Interest RtHdgUS Aggt Bd ETF | |||
| CGGR | 37.63 | 0.04 | +0.11% |
| Capital Group Growth ETF | |||
| IVOV | 91.45 | N/A | N/A |
| Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | |||
| RFI | 11.79 | -0.01 | -0.08% |
| Cohen and Steers Total Return Realty Fund | |||
PXCLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PXCLF and JUBPF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PXCLF and JUBPF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PXCLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PXCLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| JUBPF - PXCLF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FLMCF - PXCLF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SRUUF - PXCLF | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.43% | ||
| EMGDF - PXCLF | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.87% | ||
| BMTLF - PXCLF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SRUUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SRUUF has been closely correlated with DNN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SRUUF jumps, then DNN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SRUUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRUUF | 100% | +2.43% | ||
| DNN - SRUUF | 68% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CCJ - SRUUF | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| NXE - SRUUF | 63% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| EU - SRUUF | 63% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| UEC - SRUUF | 63% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||