PYHOF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.02 (-40.00%)
Updated
Dec 5 closing price
Capitalization
175.22M
VIVC
Price
$5.10
Change
+$0.05 (+0.99%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
25.29M
Ad is loading...

PYHOF vs VIVC

Header iconPYHOF vs VIVC Comparison
Open Charts PYHOF vs VIVCBanner chart's image
Playmates Holdings
Price$0.03
Change-$0.02 (-40.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization175.22M
Vivic
Price$5.10
Change+$0.05 (+0.99%)
Volume$94.55K
Capitalization25.29M
PYHOF vs VIVC Comparison Chart
Loading...
PYHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VIVC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PYHOF vs. VIVC commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYHOF is a Hold and VIVC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (PYHOF: $0.03 vs. VIVC: $5.10)
Brand notoriety: PYHOF and VIVC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PYHOF: 17% vs. VIVC: 148%
Market capitalization -- PYHOF: $175.22M vs. VIVC: $25.29M
PYHOF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $175.22M. VIVC’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $25.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PYHOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVIVC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PYHOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VIVC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, VIVC is a better buy in the long-term than PYHOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PYHOF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VIVC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PYHOF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • VIVC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PYHOF is a better buy in the short-term than VIVC.

Price Growth

PYHOF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VIVC (@Recreational Products) price change was +14.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+0.21% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PYHOF($175M) has a higher market cap than VIVC($25.3M). VIVC YTD gains are higher at: 43.662 vs. PYHOF (0.000). VIVC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -944.24K vs. PYHOF (-1.22M). PYHOF has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. VIVC (335K). VIVC has less debt than PYHOF: VIVC (657K) vs PYHOF (760M). PYHOF has higher revenues than VIVC: PYHOF (912M) vs VIVC (150K).
PYHOFVIVCPYHOF / VIVC
Capitalization175M25.3M692%
EBITDA-1.22M-944.24K129%
Gain YTD0.00043.662-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue912M150K608,000%
Total Cash1.6B335K476,418%
Total Debt760M657K115,677%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PYHOF vs VIVC: Fundamental Ratings
PYHOF
VIVC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10030
SMR RATING
1..100
9011
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9234
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9622
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PYHOF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for VIVC (94). This means that PYHOF’s stock grew significantly faster than VIVC’s over the last 12 months.

VIVC's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PYHOF (100). This means that VIVC’s stock grew significantly faster than PYHOF’s over the last 12 months.

VIVC's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PYHOF (90). This means that VIVC’s stock grew significantly faster than PYHOF’s over the last 12 months.

VIVC's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PYHOF (92). This means that VIVC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PYHOF’s over the last 12 months.

VIVC's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PYHOF (96). This means that VIVC’s stock grew significantly faster than PYHOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PYHOFVIVC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
35%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PYHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VIVC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABCB64.831.01
+1.58%
Ameris Bancorp
BPRN33.130.31
+0.94%
Princeton Bancorp
NTRS106.870.38
+0.36%
Northern Trust Corp
EVRI13.57-0.02
-0.15%
Everi Holdings
HUSA1.67-0.05
-2.91%
Houston American Energy Corp

PYHOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PYHOF and PRKA have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PYHOF and PRKA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PYHOF
1D Price
Change %
PYHOF100%
N/A
PRKA - PYHOF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VIVC - PYHOF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
THLPF - PYHOF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YAMCF - PYHOF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMNNY - PYHOF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
More

VIVC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VIVC and PRKA have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VIVC and PRKA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VIVC
1D Price
Change %
VIVC100%
+0.99%
PRKA - VIVC
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PYHOF - VIVC
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMTYF - VIVC
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNMSF - VIVC
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%
SHMDF - VIVC
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More