Advertisement
PYPL vs SIXH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYPL is a Hold and SIXH is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PYPL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- PYPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PYPL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- PYPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
PYPL (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -3.54% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.67%.
Reported Earning Dates
PYPL is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.50% weekly)A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
PYPL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| PYPL | SIXH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 69% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | N/A |
Advertisement
PYPL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PYPL has been loosely correlated with AXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PYPL jumps, then AXP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PYPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PYPL | 100% | -5.32% | ||
| AXP - PYPL | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.42% | ||
| SYF - PYPL | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.60% | ||
| COF - PYPL | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| AL - PYPL | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.17% | ||
| SOFI - PYPL | 55% Loosely correlated | -5.44% | ||
More | ||||
SIXH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SIXH has been loosely correlated with ABT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SIXH jumps, then ABT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SIXH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIXH | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| ABT - SIXH | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| PYPL - SIXH | 43% Loosely correlated | -5.32% | ||
| AAPL - SIXH | 14% Poorly correlated | -1.38% | ||
| AMZN - SIXH | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.53% | ||
| VZ - SIXH | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||