Ad is loading...
PYSVX vs SSGSX
PYSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PYSVX vs SSGSX
Putnam Small Cap Value Y
Price$14.47
Change+$0.16 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets227.52M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$39.45
Change+$0.34 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.22B
PYSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PYSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYSVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.22B vs. PYSVX (228M). PYSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PYSVX (0.94) vs SSGSX (0.52). PYSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PYSVX (24 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than PYSVX (0.93). PYSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). PYSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: PYSVX (500) vs SSGSX (2500). PYSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.88 vs. SSGSX (-14.11). PYSVX return over 5 years is better than : 99.67 vs. SSGSX (18.70).
| PYSVX | SSGSX | PYSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.074 | -15.766 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 2500 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 228M | 5.22B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.52 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.88 | -14.11 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.07 | -18.13 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.67 | 18.70 | 533% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.52 | 0.15 | -2,331% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...