Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PYSVX vs SSGSX
PYSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PYSVX vs SSGSX
Putnam Small Cap Value Y
Price$16.93
Change+$0.17 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.52M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.98
Change+$0.52 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.66B
PYSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PYSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYSVX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.66B vs. PYSVX (261M). PYSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PYSVX (0.89) vs SSGSX (0.51). PYSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PYSVX (25 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than PYSVX (0.89). PYSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). PYSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: PYSVX (500) vs SSGSX (2500). PYSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.22 vs. SSGSX (-11.31). PYSVX return over 5 years is better than : 94.58 vs. SSGSX (21.70).
| PYSVX | SSGSX | PYSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.26 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.26 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.534 | -4.243 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 2500 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261M | 5.66B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.51 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.22 | -11.31 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.21 | 1.30 | 1,401% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.58 | 21.70 | 436% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.69 | 14.39 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement