Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PYSVX vs SSGSX
PYSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PYSVX vs SSGSX
Putnam Small Cap Value Y
Price$16.18
Change+$0.22 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets258.77M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$42.96
Change+$0.52 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.55B
PYSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PYSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYSVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.55B vs. PYSVX (259M). PYSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PYSVX (0.92) vs SSGSX (0.52). PYSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PYSVX (24 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than PYSVX (0.93). PYSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). PYSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: PYSVX (500) vs SSGSX (2500). PYSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.37 vs. SSGSX (-9.66). PYSVX return over 5 years is better than : 73.99 vs. SSGSX (8.79).
| PYSVX | SSGSX | PYSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.282 | -8.594 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 2500 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 259M | 5.55B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.52 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.37 | -9.66 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.10 | -12.89 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.99 | 8.79 | 841% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.40 | 8.65 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement