Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PYSVX vs SSGSX
PYSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PYSVX vs SSGSX
Putnam Small Cap Value Y
Price$16.44
Change+$0.27 (+1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.86M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$43.83
Change+$0.68 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.56B
PYSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PYSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYSVX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.56B vs. PYSVX (252M). PYSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PYSVX (0.92) vs SSGSX (0.52). PYSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PYSVX (24 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than PYSVX (0.93). PYSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). PYSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: PYSVX (500) vs SSGSX (2500). PYSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.24 vs. SSGSX (-5.89). PYSVX return over 5 years is better than : 96.99 vs. SSGSX (27.23).
| PYSVX | SSGSX | PYSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.036 | -7.064 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 2500 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 252M | 5.56B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.52 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.24 | -5.89 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.42 | -3.81 | -326% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.99 | 27.23 | 356% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.29 | 10.33 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers