QBIEY vs SNMCY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QBIEY is a StrongBuy and SNMCY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QBIEY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNMCY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- QBIEY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SNMCY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QBIEY’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- QBIEY’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
QBIEY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +3.33% price change this week, while SNMCY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +2.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.87%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.83% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| QBIEY | SNMCY | QBIEY / SNMCY | |
| Capitalization | 15.8B | 11.9B | 133% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.623 | 47.232 | 42% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.12 | 21.74 | 93% |
| Revenue | 13.4B | 12.1B | 111% |
| Total Cash | 833M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 3.05B | N/A | - |
QBIEY | SNMCY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QBIEY's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as SNMCY (27). This means that QBIEY’s stock grew similarly to SNMCY’s over the last 12 months.
SNMCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as QBIEY (41). This means that SNMCY’s stock grew similarly to QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.
QBIEY's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as SNMCY (97). This means that QBIEY’s stock grew similarly to SNMCY’s over the last 12 months.
SNMCY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as QBIEY (54). This means that SNMCY’s stock grew similarly to QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.
SNMCY's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QBIEY (87). This means that SNMCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.
| QBIEY | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% |
QBIEY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBIEY has been loosely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QBIEY jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBIEY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBIEY | 100% | +1.96% | ||
| BNT - QBIEY | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| SMPNY - QBIEY | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.95% | ||
| MURGY - QBIEY | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.85% | ||
| SPNT - QBIEY | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.19% | ||
| TKOMY - QBIEY | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
More | ||||
SNMCY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SNMCY and SSREF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNMCY and SSREF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNMCY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNMCY | 100% | +8.67% | ||
| SSREF - SNMCY | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QBIEY - SNMCY | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.96% | ||
| PZAKY - SNMCY | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SSREY - SNMCY | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
| SCRYY - SNMCY | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.88% | ||
More | ||||