Ad is loading...
QCACX vs VSTSX
QCACX vs VSTSX Comparison
Open Charts QCACX vs VSTSX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core C
Price$36.26
Change+$0.58 (+1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.54B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Instl Sel
Price$251.05
Change+$4.37 (+1.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7T
QCACX vs VSTSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCACX vs. VSTSX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCACX is a Buy and VSTSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSTSX has more cash in the bank: 1.7T vs. QCACX (1.54B). VSTSX pays higher dividends than QCACX: VSTSX (1.37) vs QCACX (0.00). QCACX was incepted earlier than VSTSX: QCACX (20 years) vs VSTSX (9 years). QCACX (1.94) is less costly to investors than VSTSX (0.01). QCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. VSTSX (2.00). QCACX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSTSX: QCACX (1500) vs VSTSX (5000000000). VSTSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.33 vs. QCACX (-4.62). VSTSX return over 5 years is better than : 85.48 vs. QCACX (48.30).
| QCACX | VSTSX | QCACX / VSTSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.01 | 18,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.01 | 19,400% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.556 | -11.142 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.54B | 1.7T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.37 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.62 | 0.33 | -1,414% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.60 | 17.09 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.30 | 85.48 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.63 | N/A | - |