Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCACX vs VTSMX
QCACX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts QCACX vs VTSMX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core C
Price$40.70
Change+$0.24 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.87B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$139.56
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.72T
QCACX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCACX vs. VTSMX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCACX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.72T vs. QCACX (1.87B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than QCACX: VTSMX (1.26) vs QCACX (0.00). QCACX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: QCACX (20 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). QCACX (1.94) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). QCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). QCACX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: QCACX (1500) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.50 vs. QCACX (5.42). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 92.91 vs. QCACX (56.52).
| QCACX | VTSMX | QCACX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.14 | 1,314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.14 | 1,386% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.560 | -0.985 | -260% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 1.72T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.26 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | 9.50 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.82 | 44.74 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.52 | 92.91 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.02 | 169.81 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement