Ad is loading...
QCACX vs VTSMX
QCACX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts QCACX vs VTSMX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core C
Price$36.26
Change+$0.58 (+1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.54B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$127.47
Change+$2.22 (+1.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7T
QCACX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCACX vs. VTSMX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCACX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.7T vs. QCACX (1.54B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than QCACX: VTSMX (1.25) vs QCACX (0.00). QCACX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: QCACX (20 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). QCACX (1.94) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). QCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). QCACX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: QCACX (1500) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.30 vs. QCACX (-4.62). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 85.34 vs. QCACX (48.30).
| QCACX | VTSMX | QCACX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.14 | 1,314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.14 | 1,386% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.556 | -11.144 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.54B | 1.7T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.25 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.62 | 0.30 | -1,525% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.60 | 17.00 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.30 | 85.34 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.63 | 145.28 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...