Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBAX
QCBGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBAX
QCBGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. QCBGX (327M). RLBAX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBAX (1.14) vs QCBGX (0.58). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QCBGX (21 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). QCBGX (2.11) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBAX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.01 vs. QCBGX (5.89). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.42 vs. QCBGX (4.99).
| QCBGX | RLBAX | QCBGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 1.32 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 1.32 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.958 | 9.339 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327M | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.14 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.89 | 16.01 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.55 | 36.51 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.99 | 33.42 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.83 | 78.73 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers