Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBAX
QCBGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBAX
QCBGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. QCBGX (327M). RLBAX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBAX (1.11) vs QCBGX (0.58). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QCBGX (21 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). QCBGX (2.11) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBAX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.36 vs. QCBGX (1.33). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.68 vs. QCBGX (1.35).
| QCBGX | RLBAX | QCBGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 1.32 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 1.32 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.819 | 7.422 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327M | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.11 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.33 | 9.36 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.64 | 34.57 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.35 | 27.68 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.71 | 71.44 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers