Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBBX
QCBGX vs RLBBX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBBX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$22.19
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets278.64M
American Funds American Balanced R2
Price$36.56
Change+$0.05 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.03B
QCBGX vs RLBBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBBX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. QCBGX (279M). RLBBX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBBX (1.17) vs QCBGX (0.63). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBBX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBBX (23 years). QCBGX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RLBBX (1.32). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBBX (44.00). RLBBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBBX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.70 vs. QCBGX (1.68). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.76 vs. QCBGX (17.80).
| QCBGX | RLBBX | QCBGX / RLBBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.32 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.32 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.857 | 7.645 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279M | 252B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 1.17 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.68 | 5.70 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.76 | 32.86 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.80 | 34.76 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.56 | 55.33 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers