Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBCX
QCBGX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$21.96
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets274.62M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$36.28
Change+$0.10 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.05B
QCBGX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 250B vs. QCBGX (275M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBCX (1.63) vs QCBGX (0.65). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). QCBGX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBCX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.24 vs. QCBGX (2.68). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.21 vs. QCBGX (22.29).
| QCBGX | RLBCX | QCBGX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.89 | 238% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.89 | 238% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.036 | 6.857 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 275M | 250B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.63 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.68 | 7.24 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.82 | 33.02 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.29 | 41.21 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.58 | 61.08 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement