Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBFX
QCBGX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBFX
QCBGX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. QCBGX (327M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBFX (2.03) vs QCBGX (0.58). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: QCBGX (21 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). QCBGX (2.11) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBFX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.60 vs. QCBGX (1.33). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.51 vs. QCBGX (1.35).
| QCBGX | RLBFX | QCBGX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.30 | 703% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.30 | 703% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.819 | 8.088 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327M | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 2.03 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.33 | 10.60 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.64 | 38.98 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.35 | 33.51 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.71 | 84.16 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers