Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLEFX
QCBGX vs RLEFX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLEFX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$22.13
Change-$0.12 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets278.64M
American Funds American Balanced R5E
Price$36.80
Change-$0.12 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.03B
QCBGX vs RLEFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLEFX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLEFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLEFX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. QCBGX (279M). RLEFX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLEFX (2.01) vs QCBGX (0.63). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLEFX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLEFX (10 years). QCBGX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RLEFX (0.39). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLEFX (44.00). RLEFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLEFX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. QCBGX (2.70). RLEFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.24 vs. QCBGX (19.57).
| QCBGX | RLEFX | QCBGX / RLEFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.39 | 544% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.39 | 544% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.436 | 8.047 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279M | 252B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 2.01 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.70 | 7.00 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.04 | 36.71 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.57 | 41.24 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers