Ad is loading...
QCLN vs TOKE
QCLN vs TOKE Comparison
Open Charts QCLN vs TOKE
First Trust NASDAQ® Cln Edge® GrnEngyETF
Price$34.74
Change-$1.66 (-4.56%)
Volume$600
CapitalizationN/A
Cambria Cannabis ETF
Price$5.28
Change+$0.16 (+3.12%)
Volume$239
CapitalizationN/A
QCLN vs TOKE Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLN vs. TOKE commentary
Dec 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLN is a StrongBuy and TOKE is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QCLN has more net assets: 602M vs. TOKE (14.5M). TOKE has a higher annual dividend yield than QCLN: TOKE (-9.163) vs QCLN (-12.952). QCLN was incepted earlier than TOKE: QCLN (18 years) vs TOKE (5 years). TOKE has a higher turnover QCLN (17.00) vs QCLN (17.00).
| QCLN | TOKE | QCLN / TOKE | |
| Gain YTD | -12.952 | -9.163 | 141% |
| Net Assets | 602M | 14.5M | 4,152% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 17.00 | 23.00 | 74% |
| Yield | 0.77 | 3.59 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QCLN | TOKE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QCLN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCLN has been closely correlated with FLNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCLN jumps, then FLNC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCLN | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| FLNC - QCLN | 72% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| AEIS - QCLN | 72% Closely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| BLDP - QCLN | 72% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ENPH - QCLN | 71% Closely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| ALB - QCLN | 70% Closely correlated | -2.00% | ||
More | ||||
TOKE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TOKE and IIPR have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TOKE and IIPR's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOKE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOKE | 100% | +0.59% | ||
| IIPR - TOKE | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.82% | ||
| GNLN - TOKE | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.63% | ||
| MO - TOKE | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
| UVV - TOKE | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.61% | ||
| SMG - TOKE | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
More | ||||