Ad is loading...
QCLN vs TOKE
QCLN vs TOKE Comparison
Open Charts QCLN vs TOKE
First Trust NASDAQ® Cln Edge® GrnEngyETF
Price$26.14
Change+$0.18 (+0.69%)
Volume$1.2K
Net Assets345.04M
Cambria Cannabis ETF
Price$4.29
Change+$0.07 (+1.66%)
Volume$222
Net Assets10.83M
QCLN vs TOKE Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLN vs. TOKE commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLN is a Hold and TOKE is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QCLN has more net assets: 345M vs. TOKE (10.8M). TOKE has a higher annual dividend yield than QCLN: TOKE (-17.865) vs QCLN (-23.439). QCLN was incepted earlier than TOKE: QCLN (18 years) vs TOKE (6 years). TOKE (0.43) has a lower expense ratio than QCLN (0.59). QCLN has a higher turnover TOKE (13.00) vs TOKE (13.00).
| QCLN | TOKE | QCLN / TOKE | |
| Gain YTD | -23.439 | -17.865 | 131% |
| Net Assets | 345M | 10.8M | 3,194% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.43 | 137% |
| Turnover | 17.00 | 13.00 | 131% |
| Yield | 1.10 | 6.13 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QCLN | TOKE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QCLN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCLN has been closely correlated with ON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCLN jumps, then ON could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCLN | 100% | -2.15% | ||
| ON - QCLN | 74% Closely correlated | -4.46% | ||
| AEIS - QCLN | 72% Closely correlated | -4.04% | ||
| BLDP - QCLN | 72% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| POWI - QCLN | 71% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| ALB - QCLN | 70% Closely correlated | -2.67% | ||
More | ||||
TOKE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOKE has been loosely correlated with HITI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TOKE jumps, then HITI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOKE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOKE | 100% | +1.51% | ||
| HITI - TOKE | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| IIPR - TOKE | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
| SAM - TOKE | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.87% | ||
| GNLN - TOKE | 15% Poorly correlated | -13.20% | ||
| MO - TOKE | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
More | ||||