Ad is loading...
QCLN vs TOKE
QCLN vs TOKE Comparison
Open Charts QCLN vs TOKE
First Trust NASDAQ® Cln Edge® GrnEngyETF
Price$29.47
Change+$0.81 (+2.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets366.26M
Cambria Cannabis ETF
Price$4.65
Change-$0.06 (-1.27%)
Volume$100
Net Assets12.03M
QCLN vs TOKE Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLN vs. TOKE commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLN is a Buy and TOKE is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QCLN has more net assets: 366M vs. TOKE (12M). TOKE has a higher annual dividend yield than QCLN: TOKE (-8.219) vs QCLN (-15.476). QCLN was incepted earlier than TOKE: QCLN (18 years) vs TOKE (6 years). TOKE (0.43) has a lower expense ratio than QCLN (0.59). QCLN has a higher turnover TOKE (13.00) vs TOKE (13.00).
| QCLN | TOKE | QCLN / TOKE | |
| Gain YTD | -15.476 | -8.219 | 188% |
| Net Assets | 366M | 12M | 3,050% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.43 | 137% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 13.00 | 223% |
| Yield | 1.14 | 5.65 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QCLN | TOKE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QCLN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCLN has been closely correlated with ON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCLN jumps, then ON could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCLN | 100% | +3.28% | ||
| ON - QCLN | 74% Closely correlated | +2.50% | ||
| AEIS - QCLN | 72% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| BLDP - QCLN | 72% Closely correlated | +8.33% | ||
| POWI - QCLN | 70% Closely correlated | +2.80% | ||
| ALB - QCLN | 70% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TOKE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOKE has been loosely correlated with HITI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TOKE jumps, then HITI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOKE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOKE | 100% | -0.30% | ||
| HITI - TOKE | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| SAM - TOKE | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.59% | ||
| IIPR - TOKE | 15% Poorly correlated | +4.29% | ||
| MO - TOKE | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.84% | ||
| UVV - TOKE | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.93% | ||
More | ||||