Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QDPL vs RECS
QDPL vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QDPL vs RECS
Pacer Metaurus US Lg Cp Dvd Mltp 400 ETF
Price$39.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.38%)
Volume$166.14K
Net Assets1.02B
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$36.66
Change+$0.21 (+0.58%)
Volume$376.74K
Net Assets3.02B
QDPL vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QDPL vs. RECS commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QDPL is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.02B vs. QDPL (1.02B). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than QDPL: RECS (5.893) vs QDPL (5.101). QDPL was incepted earlier than RECS: QDPL (4 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than QDPL (0.60). RECS has a higher turnover QDPL (7.00) vs QDPL (7.00).
| QDPL | RECS | QDPL / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 5.101 | 5.893 | 87% |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 3.02B | 34% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.15 | 400% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 49.00 | 14% |
| Yield | 5.51 | 0.69 | 798% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QDPL | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QDPL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QDPL has been loosely correlated with AAPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QDPL jumps, then AAPL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QDPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDPL | 100% | +0.38% | ||
| AAPL - QDPL | 59% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MSFT - QDPL | 58% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AMZN - QDPL | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.85% | ||
| NVDA - QDPL | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.76% |
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +2.85% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||