Ad is loading...
QDPL vs RECS
QDPL vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QDPL vs RECS
Pacer Metaurus US Lg Cp Dvd Mltp 400 ETF
Price$35.18
Change-$1.68 (-4.56%)
Volume$228
Net Assets842.04M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$31.81
Change-$1.77 (-5.27%)
Volume$2.19K
Net Assets2.29B
QDPL vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QDPL vs. RECS commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QDPL is a Hold and RECS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.29B vs. QDPL (842M). QDPL has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: QDPL (-2.590) vs RECS (-3.004). QDPL was incepted earlier than RECS: QDPL (4 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS has a higher turnover QDPL (4.00) vs QDPL (4.00).
| QDPL | RECS | QDPL / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -2.590 | -3.004 | 86% |
| Net Assets | 842M | 2.29B | 37% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | 0.15 | - |
| Turnover | 4.00 | 49.00 | 8% |
| Yield | 5.77 | 0.73 | 795% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QDPL | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 75% | 7 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QDPL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QDPL has been loosely correlated with AAPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QDPL jumps, then AAPL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QDPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDPL | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| AAPL - QDPL | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| MSFT - QDPL | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| AMZN - QDPL | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| NVDA - QDPL | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.25% |
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.78% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.38% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.30% | ||
More | ||||