Ad is loading...
QDPL vs RECS
QDPL vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QDPL vs RECS
Pacer Metaurus US Lg Cp Dvd Mltp 400 ETF
Price$38.83
Change-$1.08 (-2.71%)
Volume$319
CapitalizationN/A
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$34.48
Change-$1.39 (-3.87%)
Volume$942
CapitalizationN/A
QDPL vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QDPL vs. RECS commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QDPL is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 1.56B vs. QDPL (726M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than QDPL: RECS (29.484) vs QDPL (25.959). QDPL was incepted earlier than RECS: QDPL (3 years) vs RECS (5 years). RECS has a higher turnover QDPL (4.00) vs QDPL (4.00).
| QDPL | RECS | QDPL / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 25.959 | 29.484 | 88% |
| Net Assets | 726M | 1.56B | 47% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 4.00 | 45.00 | 9% |
| Yield | 5.77 | 0.89 | 647% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QDPL | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 82% | 15 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QDPL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QDPL has been loosely correlated with AAPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QDPL jumps, then AAPL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QDPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDPL | 100% | -0.25% | ||
| AAPL - QDPL | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| MSFT - QDPL | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| AMZN - QDPL | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| NVDA - QDPL | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.22% |
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
More | ||||