Ad is loading...
QDPL vs RECS
QDPL vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QDPL vs RECS
Pacer Metaurus US Lg Cp Dvd Mltp 400 ETF
Price$39.30
Change-$0.60 (-1.50%)
Volume$257.29K
Net Assets875.98M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.36
Change-$0.62 (-1.72%)
Volume$330.07K
Net Assets1.89B
QDPL vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QDPL vs. RECS commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QDPL is a StrongBuy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 1.89B vs. QDPL (876M). QDPL has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: QDPL (2.370) vs RECS (2.137). QDPL was incepted earlier than RECS: QDPL (4 years) vs RECS (5 years). RECS has a higher turnover QDPL (4.00) vs QDPL (4.00).
| QDPL | RECS | QDPL / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 2.370 | 2.137 | 111% |
| Net Assets | 876M | 1.89B | 46% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 4.00 | 45.00 | 9% |
| Yield | 5.77 | 0.89 | 647% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QDPL | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QDPL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QDPL has been loosely correlated with AAPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QDPL jumps, then AAPL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QDPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDPL | 100% | -1.50% | ||
| AAPL - QDPL | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| MSFT - QDPL | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| AMZN - QDPL | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| NVDA - QDPL | 56% Loosely correlated | -4.05% |
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -1.72% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.37% | ||
More | ||||