Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QDPL vs RECS
QDPL vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QDPL vs RECS
Pacer Metaurus US Lg Cp Dvd Mltp 400 ETF
Price$38.74
Change+$0.40 (+1.04%)
Volume$130
Net Assets942.01M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.61
Change+$0.45 (+1.28%)
Volume$3.25K
Net Assets2.79B
QDPL vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QDPL vs. RECS commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QDPL is a Buy and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.79B vs. QDPL (942M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than QDPL: RECS (1.560) vs QDPL (1.321). QDPL was incepted earlier than RECS: QDPL (4 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than QDPL (0.60). RECS has a higher turnover QDPL (7.00) vs QDPL (7.00).
| QDPL | RECS | QDPL / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 1.321 | 1.560 | 85% |
| Net Assets | 942M | 2.79B | 34% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.15 | 400% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 49.00 | 14% |
| Yield | 5.51 | 0.69 | 798% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QDPL | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 75% | 17 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QDPL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QDPL has been loosely correlated with AAPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QDPL jumps, then AAPL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QDPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDPL | 100% | -0.67% | ||
| AAPL - QDPL | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| MSFT - QDPL | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| AMZN - QDPL | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| NVDA - QDPL | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.36% |
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.17% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
More | ||||