Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QGRPX vs RGACX
QGRPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts QGRPX vs RGACX
UBS US Quality Growth At Rsnbl Prc P
Price$17.35
Change-$0.09 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets318.9M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$74.25
Change-$0.24 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets303.24B
QGRPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QGRPX vs. RGACX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QGRPX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 303B vs. QGRPX (319M). QGRPX pays higher dividends than RGACX: QGRPX (0.45) vs RGACX (0.08). QGRPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: QGRPX (5 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than QGRPX (0.79). QGRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than QGRPX: RGACX (250) vs QGRPX (1000). QGRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.58 vs. RGACX (6.76).
| QGRPX | RGACX | QGRPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.94 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.94 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.219 | 3.139 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 319M | 303B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.08 | 530% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.58 | 6.76 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.62 | 41.78 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 47.48 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers