QGRW vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QGRW is a Hold and SNPS is a Hold.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| QGRW | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 56% | 10 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 72% | 10 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 64% | 16 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 48% |
QGRW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QGRW has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QGRW jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QGRW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGRW | 100% | +1.36% | ||
| CDNS - QGRW | 77% Closely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| SNPS - QGRW | 76% Closely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| LRCX - QGRW | 76% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| KLAC - QGRW | 75% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| AMAT - QGRW | 74% Closely correlated | +2.99% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | +2.11% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 86% Closely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| ANSS - SNPS | 77% Closely correlated | +1.60% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.49% | ||
| MSFT - SNPS | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| CLSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | +6.17% | ||
More | ||||