Ad is loading...
QKACX vs VITSX
QKACX vs VITSX Comparison
Open Charts QKACX vs VITSX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core R6
Price$42.09
Change+$3.71 (+9.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
Price$129.89
Change+$11.31 (+9.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7T
QKACX vs VITSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QKACX vs. VITSX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QKACX is a Buy and VITSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITSX has more cash in the bank: 1.7T vs. QKACX (1.43B). VITSX pays higher dividends than QKACX: VITSX (1.36) vs QKACX (0.47). QKACX was incepted earlier than VITSX: QKACX (18 years) vs VITSX (28 years). QKACX (0.86) is less costly to investors than VITSX (0.03). QKACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. VITSX (2.00). QKACX has a lower initial minimum investment than VITSX: QKACX (0) vs VITSX (5000000). VITSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.42 vs. QKACX (-7.82). VITSX return over 5 years is better than : 75.44 vs. QKACX (53.99).
| QKACX | VITSX | QKACX / VITSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.03 | 2,467% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.03 | 2,867% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.062 | -15.904 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 1.7T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.36 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.82 | -5.42 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.56 | 8.75 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.99 | 75.44 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.68 | 131.99 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...