Ad is loading...
QKACX vs VTSMX
QKACX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts QKACX vs VTSMX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core R6
Price$42.09
Change+$3.71 (+9.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$129.85
Change+$11.31 (+9.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7T
QKACX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QKACX vs. VTSMX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QKACX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.7T vs. QKACX (1.43B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than QKACX: VTSMX (1.25) vs QKACX (0.47). QKACX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: QKACX (18 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). QKACX (0.86) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). QKACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). QKACX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: QKACX (0) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.43 vs. QKACX (-7.82). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 75.41 vs. QKACX (53.99).
| QKACX | VTSMX | QKACX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.14 | 529% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.14 | 614% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.062 | -15.905 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 1.7T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.25 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.82 | -5.43 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.56 | 8.73 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.99 | 75.41 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.68 | 131.53 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...