Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLC vs RECS
QLC vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QLC vs RECS
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap ETF
Price$71.52
Change+$0.16 (+0.22%)
Volume$4.17K
Net Assets534.99M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$37.06
Change-$0.12 (-0.32%)
Volume$513.06K
Net Assets3.08B
QLC vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLC vs. RECS commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLC is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.08B vs. QLC (535M). QLC has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: QLC (8.190) vs RECS (7.048). QLC was incepted earlier than RECS: QLC (10 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than QLC (0.25). RECS has a higher turnover QLC (16.00) vs QLC (16.00).
| QLC | RECS | QLC / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 8.190 | 7.048 | 116% |
| Net Assets | 535M | 3.08B | 17% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.15 | 167% |
| Turnover | 16.00 | 49.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 0.95 | 0.65 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QLC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 72% | 9 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DIISX | 22.54 | N/A | N/A |
| BNY Mellon International Stock Index Inv | |||
| VTCLX | 320.68 | N/A | N/A |
| Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital App Adm | |||
| CFSMX | 13.07 | N/A | N/A |
| Clarkston Partners Founders | |||
| BDBPX | 24.21 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Idx Inv P | |||
| IAFMX | 19.04 | N/A | N/A |
| F/m Investments Large Cap Focused Inv | |||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.32% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
More | ||||