Ad is loading...
QLC vs RECS
QLC vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QLC vs RECS
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap ETF
Price$64.53
Change+$0.21 (+0.33%)
Volume$32.36K
Net Assets409.64M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$33.46
Change+$0.29 (+0.87%)
Volume$396.89K
Net Assets2.57B
QLC vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLC vs. RECS commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLC is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.57B vs. QLC (410M). QLC has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: QLC (-2.624) vs RECS (-3.351). QLC was incepted earlier than RECS: QLC (10 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than QLC (0.25). RECS has a higher turnover QLC (16.00) vs QLC (16.00).
| QLC | RECS | QLC / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -2.624 | -3.351 | 78% |
| Net Assets | 410M | 2.57B | 16% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.15 | 167% |
| Turnover | 16.00 | 49.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 1.06 | 0.73 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QLC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLC has been closely correlated with WAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLC jumps, then WAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLC | 100% | +0.33% | ||
| WAB - QLC | 78% Closely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| ZBRA - QLC | 74% Closely correlated | +3.14% | ||
| CRBG - QLC | 73% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| FLEX - QLC | 71% Closely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| SYF - QLC | 71% Closely correlated | +3.14% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.87% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
More | ||||