Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLC vs RECS
QLC vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QLC vs RECS
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap ETF
Price$69.22
Change+$0.30 (+0.44%)
Volume$28.1K
Net Assets501.5M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.80
Change+$0.15 (+0.42%)
Volume$512.51K
Net Assets2.9B
QLC vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLC vs. RECS commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLC is a Hold and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.9B vs. QLC (501M). QLC has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: QLC (4.454) vs RECS (3.408). QLC was incepted earlier than RECS: QLC (10 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than QLC (0.25). RECS has a higher turnover QLC (16.00) vs QLC (16.00).
| QLC | RECS | QLC / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 4.454 | 3.408 | 131% |
| Net Assets | 501M | 2.9B | 17% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.15 | 167% |
| Turnover | 16.00 | 49.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 1.00 | 0.69 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QLC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 73% | 24 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLC has been closely correlated with WAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLC jumps, then WAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLC | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| WAB - QLC | 80% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| CRBG - QLC | 77% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| ZBRA - QLC | 75% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| FLEX - QLC | 73% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| SYF - QLC | 73% Closely correlated | -0.57% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.42% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.32% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
More | ||||