Ad is loading...
QLC vs RECS
QLC vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QLC vs RECS
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap ETF
Price$66.49
Change-$1.19 (-1.76%)
Volume$6.11K
Net Assets357.26M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$33.89
Change-$0.61 (-1.77%)
Volume$2.31K
Net Assets1.89B
QLC vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLC vs. RECS commentary
Mar 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLC is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 1.89B vs. QLC (357M). QLC has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: QLC (0.146) vs RECS (-0.347). QLC was incepted earlier than RECS: QLC (9 years) vs RECS (5 years). RECS has a higher turnover QLC (20.00) vs QLC (20.00).
| QLC | RECS | QLC / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 0.146 | -0.347 | -42% |
| Net Assets | 357M | 1.89B | 19% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 20.00 | 45.00 | 44% |
| Yield | 1.11 | 0.89 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QLC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 87% | 14 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 71% | 6 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLC has been closely correlated with XYZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLC jumps, then XYZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLC | 100% | -1.76% | ||
| XYZ - QLC | 69% Closely correlated | -3.84% | ||
| LRCX - QLC | 66% Closely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| HUBB - QLC | 65% Loosely correlated | -4.48% | ||
| CDNS - QLC | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.50% | ||
| KLAC - QLC | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.50% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -1.79% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -3.42% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -3.50% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.14% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.18% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.25% | ||
More | ||||