Ad is loading...
QLV vs RECS
QLV vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QLV vs RECS
FlexShares US Quality Low Vol ETF
Price$64.56
Change-$1.40 (-2.12%)
Volume$300
Net Assets125.11M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$31.81
Change-$1.77 (-5.27%)
Volume$2.19K
Net Assets2.29B
QLV vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLV vs. RECS commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLV is a Hold and RECS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.29B vs. QLV (125M). QLV has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: QLV (1.444) vs RECS (-3.004). QLV was incepted earlier than RECS: QLV (6 years) vs RECS (6 years). QLV (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than RECS (0.15). RECS (49.00) and QLV (48.00) have matching turnover.
| QLV | RECS | QLV / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 1.444 | -3.004 | -48% |
| Net Assets | 125M | 2.29B | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.15 | 53% |
| Turnover | 48.00 | 49.00 | 98% |
| Yield | 1.73 | 0.73 | 238% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QLV | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 68% | 7 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLV has been loosely correlated with MSGS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLV jumps, then MSGS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLV | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| MSGS - QLV | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| PECO - QLV | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| DTM - QLV | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.45% | ||
| BIIB - QLV | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
| RYAN - QLV | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.69% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.78% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.38% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.30% | ||
More | ||||