Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLV vs RECS
QLV vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QLV vs RECS
FlexShares US Quality Low Vol ETF
Price$68.78
Change+$0.42 (+0.61%)
Volume$2.5K
Net Assets143.57M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$37.37
Change+$0.28 (+0.75%)
Volume$347.58K
Net Assets3.08B
QLV vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLV vs. RECS commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLV is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.08B vs. QLV (144M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than QLV: RECS (7.943) vs QLV (6.221). QLV was incepted earlier than RECS: QLV (6 years) vs RECS (6 years). QLV (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than RECS (0.15). RECS (49.00) and QLV (48.00) have matching turnover.
| QLV | RECS | QLV / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 6.221 | 7.943 | 78% |
| Net Assets | 144M | 3.08B | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.15 | 53% |
| Turnover | 48.00 | 49.00 | 98% |
| Yield | 1.64 | 0.65 | 250% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QLV | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 68% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLV has been closely correlated with ADI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLV jumps, then ADI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLV | 100% | +0.62% | ||
| ADI - QLV | 71% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| FDS - QLV | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| MSGS - QLV | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| PECO - QLV | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| FOXA - QLV | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.03% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.75% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +5.10% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
More | ||||