Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLV vs RECS
QLV vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QLV vs RECS
FlexShares US Quality Low Vol ETF
Price$67.29
Change-$0.67 (-0.99%)
Volume$401
Net Assets138.46M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.38
Change-$0.42 (-1.17%)
Volume$3.8K
Net Assets2.9B
QLV vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLV vs. RECS commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLV is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.9B vs. QLV (138M). QLV has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: QLV (4.519) vs RECS (3.408). QLV was incepted earlier than RECS: QLV (6 years) vs RECS (6 years). QLV (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than RECS (0.15). RECS (49.00) and QLV (48.00) have matching turnover.
| QLV | RECS | QLV / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 4.519 | 3.408 | 133% |
| Net Assets | 138M | 2.9B | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.15 | 53% |
| Turnover | 48.00 | 49.00 | 98% |
| Yield | 1.70 | 0.69 | 246% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QLV | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 69% | 24 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLV has been closely correlated with ADI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLV jumps, then ADI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLV | 100% | +0.65% | ||
| ADI - QLV | 71% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| MSGS - QLV | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.92% | ||
| FDS - QLV | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| PECO - QLV | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| FOXA - QLV | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.54% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.42% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.32% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
More | ||||