Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QTEC vs SMH
QTEC vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts QTEC vs SMH
QTEC vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QTEC vs. SMH commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTEC is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 66.2B vs. QTEC (4.55B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than QTEC: SMH (50.532) vs QTEC (31.976). QTEC was incepted earlier than SMH: QTEC (20 years) vs SMH (15 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than QTEC (0.55). QTEC has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| QTEC | SMH | QTEC / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 31.976 | 50.532 | 63% |
| Net Assets | 4.55B | 66.2B | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.35 | 157% |
| Turnover | 38.00 | 12.00 | 317% |
| Yield | 0.01 | 0.20 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QTEC | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 89% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 24 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
QTEC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTEC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTEC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTEC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTEC | 100% | -0.83% | ||
| LRCX - QTEC | 77% Closely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| KLAC - QTEC | 74% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| AMAT - QTEC | 74% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| MU - QTEC | 72% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| SWKS - QTEC | 72% Closely correlated | +13.55% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 89% Closely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| MU - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||