QUCOF vs SNMCY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QUCOF is a Hold and SNMCY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QUCOF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSNMCY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- QUCOF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- SNMCY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Price Growth
QUCOF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SNMCY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +2.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.87%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.83% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| QUCOF | SNMCY | QUCOF / SNMCY | |
| Capitalization | 1.99B | 11.9B | 17% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.382 | 47.232 | -7% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.25 | 21.74 | 66% |
| Revenue | 41.2B | 12.1B | 340% |
| Total Cash | 2.35B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
SNMCY | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
QUCOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUCOF has been loosely correlated with LMND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QUCOF jumps, then LMND could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QUCOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUCOF | 100% | N/A | ||
| LMND - QUCOF | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| PLMR - QUCOF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.63% | ||
| QBIEY - QUCOF | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.96% | ||
| SSREY - QUCOF | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
| SNMCY - QUCOF | 3% Poorly correlated | +8.67% | ||
More | ||||
SNMCY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SNMCY and SSREF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNMCY and SSREF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNMCY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNMCY | 100% | +8.67% | ||
| SSREF - SNMCY | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QBIEY - SNMCY | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.96% | ||
| PZAKY - SNMCY | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SSREY - SNMCY | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
| SCRYY - SNMCY | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.88% | ||
More | ||||