| QVMM | SCHM | QVMM / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 17.047 | 20.907 | 82% |
| Net Assets | 440M | 15.1B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.03 | 500% |
| Turnover | 34.00 | 17.00 | 200% |
| Yield | 1.15 | 1.27 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
| QVMM | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 78% | 10 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 70% | 18 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 81% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BAIV | 29.05 | 0.22 | +0.75% |
| Brown Advisory International Val Sel ETF | |||
| ZSC | 30.71 | N/A | N/A |
| USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy | |||
| ULST | 40.37 | N/A | -0.01% |
| State Street® Ultra Short Term Bond ETF | |||
| MLPX | 74.36 | -1.02 | -1.35% |
| Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | |||
| AMZZ | 34.72 | -0.59 | -1.67% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QVMM has been closely correlated with NDSN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QVMM jumps, then NDSN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QVMM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QVMM | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| NDSN - QVMM | 75% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| KMT - QVMM | 74% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| MAC - QVMM | 72% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| DAN - QVMM | 72% Closely correlated | +3.15% | ||
| CATY - QVMM | 71% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.67% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +4.42% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | +4.55% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.05% | ||
More | ||||