RANKF
Price
$0.81
Change
+$0.01 (+1.25%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Capitalization
552.69M
RVLCF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.03 (-30.00%)
Updated
Dec 31 closing price
Capitalization
63.98M
Ad is loading...

RANKF vs RVLCF

Header iconRANKF vs RVLCF Comparison
Open Charts RANKF vs RVLCFBanner chart's image
Rank Group (THE) p.l.c
Price$0.81
Change+$0.01 (+1.25%)
Volume$270
Capitalization552.69M
Rivalry
Price$0.07
Change-$0.03 (-30.00%)
Volume$3.9K
Capitalization63.98M
RANKF vs RVLCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
RANKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RVLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RANKF vs. RVLCF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RANKF is a Hold and RVLCF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (RANKF: $0.81 vs. RVLCF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: RANKF and RVLCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RANKF: 29% vs. RVLCF: 17%
Market capitalization -- RANKF: $552.69M vs. RVLCF: $63.98M
RANKF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $552.69M. RVLCF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $63.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RANKF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRVLCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RANKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RVLCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RANKF is a better buy in the long-term than RVLCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RANKF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RVLCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RANKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • RVLCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RANKF is a better buy in the short-term than RVLCF.

Price Growth

RANKF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RVLCF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +58.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+0.37% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RANKF($553M) has a higher market cap than RVLCF($64M). RANKF (0.000) and RVLCF (0.000) have similar YTD gains . RVLCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -27.6M vs. RANKF (-48.6M). RANKF has more cash in the bank: 89.7M vs. RVLCF (8.54M). RVLCF has less debt than RANKF: RVLCF (481K) vs RANKF (248M). RANKF has higher revenues than RVLCF: RANKF (649M) vs RVLCF (33.8M).
RANKFRVLCFRANKF / RVLCF
Capitalization553M64M864%
EBITDA-48.6M-27.6M176%
Gain YTD0.0000.000-
P/E Ratio6.96N/A-
Revenue649M33.8M1,920%
Total Cash89.7M8.54M1,050%
Total Debt248M481K51,559%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RANKF: Fundamental Ratings
RANKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RANKFRVLCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RANKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RVLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QQQ521.748.66
+1.69%
Invesco QQQ Trust
PDP112.760.96
+0.86%
Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
DRLL29.820.14
+0.48%
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
IOCT29.560.08
+0.28%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF™ - Oct
SNAV30.860.04
+0.13%
Mohr Sector Nav ETF

RANKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RANKF and SKXJF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RANKF and SKXJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RANKF
1D Price
Change %
RANKF100%
N/A
SKXJF - RANKF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RVLCF - RANKF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WYNMF - RANKF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCHYY - RANKF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
NGCRF - RANKF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RVLCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RVLCF and RANKF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RVLCF and RANKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RVLCF
1D Price
Change %
RVLCF100%
N/A
RANKF - RVLCF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JPOTF - RVLCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GAMB - RVLCF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.25%
CDRO - RVLCF
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
BTSBF - RVLCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More