Ad is loading...
RBBAX vs SAUPX
RBBAX vs SAUPX Comparison
Open Charts RBBAX vs SAUPX
Columbia Income Builder A
Price$11.71
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets842.27M
Principal SAM Flexible Income A
Price$12.17
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.23B
RBBAX vs SAUPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RBBAX vs. SAUPX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBBAX is a Hold and SAUPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAUPX has more cash in the bank: 2.23B vs. RBBAX (842M). RBBAX pays higher dividends than SAUPX: RBBAX (3.81) vs SAUPX (2.82). RBBAX was incepted earlier than SAUPX: RBBAX (19 years) vs SAUPX (29 years). SAUPX (1.00) and RBBAX (0.97) have similar cost to investors . SAUPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.80 vs. RBBAX (18.00). RBBAX initial investment is less costly to investors than SAUPX (4%) vs SAUPX (4%). SAUPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBBAX: SAUPX (1000) vs RBBAX (2000). RBBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. SAUPX (6.53). RBBAX return over 5 years is better than : 21.68 vs. SAUPX (16.09).
| RBBAX | SAUPX | RBBAX / SAUPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.00 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.00 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.661 | 1.811 | 147% |
| Front Load | 5% | 4% | 127% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 842M | 2.23B | 38% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.81 | 2.82 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.84 | 6.53 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.56 | 13.49 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.68 | 16.09 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.76 | 23.07 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...