Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RBBCX vs SCUPX
RBBCX vs SCUPX Comparison
Open Charts RBBCX vs SCUPX
Columbia Income Builder C
Price$12.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets852.13M
Principal SAM Flexible Income C
Price$12.34
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.25B
RBBCX vs SCUPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RBBCX vs. SCUPX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBBCX is a Hold and SCUPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCUPX has more cash in the bank: 2.25B vs. RBBCX (852M). RBBCX pays higher dividends than SCUPX: RBBCX (2.94) vs SCUPX (1.99). RBBCX was incepted earlier than SCUPX: RBBCX (19 years) vs SCUPX (23 years). SCUPX (1.80) and RBBCX (1.72) have similar cost to investors . SCUPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.80 vs. RBBCX (18.00). SCUPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBBCX: SCUPX (1000) vs RBBCX (2000). RBBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.38 vs. SCUPX (7.09). RBBCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.40 vs. SCUPX (10.46).
| RBBCX | SCUPX | RBBCX / SCUPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.80 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.80 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.528 | 4.462 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 852M | 2.25B | 38% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.94 | 1.99 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.38 | 7.09 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.08 | 16.91 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.40 | 10.46 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.39 | 18.87 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement