Ad is loading...
RBEKX vs RDGTX
RBEKX vs RDGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RBEKX vs. RDGTX commentary
Feb 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBEKX is a Hold and RDGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEKX (46.5B) and RDGTX (46.5B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RDGTX pays higher dividends than RBEKX: RDGTX (1.35) vs RBEKX (1.00). RBEKX was incepted earlier than RDGTX: RBEKX (10 years) vs RDGTX (18 years). RBEKX (1.00) and RDGTX (1.00) have comparable annual turnover. RBEKX (250) and RDGTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RDGTX (11.26) and RBEKX (10.76) have marching annual gain over last year. RDGTX return over 5 years is better than : 32.28 vs. RBEKX (29.82).
| RBEKX | RDGTX | RBEKX / RDGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.298 | 3.386 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.5B | 46.5B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.35 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.76 | 11.26 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.33 | 15.60 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.82 | 32.28 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.75 | 63.84 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UGTAX | 28.17 | -0.23 | -0.81% |
| Victory Growth and Tax Strategy A | |||
| RECRX | 11.96 | -0.10 | -0.83% |
| RBC Emerging Markets Ex-China Equity R6 | |||
| MCVRX | 29.93 | -0.43 | -1.42% |
| MFS Mid Cap Value R2 | |||
| CGCIX | 12.99 | -0.19 | -1.44% |
| Calamos Global Opportunities I | |||
| UIGRX | 38.80 | -0.92 | -2.32% |
| Victory Growth Institutional | |||