Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RBFEX vs WATFX
RBFEX vs WATFX Comparison
Open Charts RBFEX vs WATFX
American Funds Bond Fund of Amer R4
Price$11.37
Change+$0.05 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.14B
Western Asset Core Bond I
Price$10.65
Change+$0.06 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2B
RBFEX vs WATFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RBFEX vs. WATFX commentary
Aug 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBFEX is a Hold and WATFX is a Sell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBFEX has more cash in the bank: 95.1B vs. WATFX (2B). WATFX pays higher dividends than RBFEX: WATFX (4.63) vs RBFEX (4.25). RBFEX was incepted earlier than WATFX: RBFEX (23 years) vs WATFX (35 years). RBFEX (0.59) is less costly to investors than WATFX (0.56). RBFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 370.00 vs. WATFX (85.00). RBFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than WATFX: RBFEX (250) vs WATFX (1000000). WATFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.37 vs. RBFEX (2.88). RBFEX return over 5 years is better than : -6.60 vs. WATFX (-8.32).
| RBFEX | WATFX | RBFEX / WATFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.45 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.56 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.610 | 5.201 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.1B | 2B | 4,748% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.25 | 4.63 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.88 | 3.37 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.54 | 8.17 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.60 | -8.32 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.08 | 17.76 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement