Ad is loading...
RBFTX vs RHFTX
RBFTX vs RHFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RBFTX vs. RHFTX commentary
May 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBFTX is a Hold and RHFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBFTX (48.9B) and RHFTX (48.9B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RHFTX pays higher dividends than RBFTX: RHFTX (1.85) vs RBFTX (0.98). RBFTX was incepted earlier than RHFTX: RBFTX (18 years) vs RHFTX (9 years). RBFTX (1.43) is less costly to investors than RHFTX (0.48). RBFTX (7.00) and RHFTX (7.00) have comparable annual turnover. RBFTX (250) and RHFTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RHFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.84 vs. RBFTX (7.75). RHFTX return over 5 years is better than : 43.09 vs. RBFTX (37.89).
| RBFTX | RHFTX | RBFTX / RHFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.48 | 298% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.48 | 298% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.846 | 2.119 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.9B | 48.9B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 1.85 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.75 | 8.84 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.99 | 17.58 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.89 | 43.09 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...