Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RBNTX vs RHKTX
RBNTX vs RHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RBNTX vs. RHKTX commentary
Jul 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBNTX is a Hold and RHKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBNTX (17.4B) and RHKTX (17.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RHKTX pays higher dividends than RBNTX: RHKTX (0.94) vs RBNTX (0.17). RBNTX was incepted earlier than RHKTX: RBNTX (10 years) vs RHKTX (10 years). RBNTX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RHKTX (0.53). RBNTX (5.00) and RHKTX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. RBNTX (250) and RHKTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.45 vs. RBNTX (14.35). RHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 48.19 vs. RBNTX (42.85).
| RBNTX | RHKTX | RBNTX / RHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.53 | 279% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.53 | 279% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.846 | 12.416 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.4B | 17.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.94 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.35 | 15.45 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.53 | 38.75 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.85 | 48.19 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement