Ad is loading...
RBVAX vs SSGSX
RBVAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RBVAX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.69
Change+$0.63 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.33B
RBVAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.33B vs. RBVAX (25.5M). RBVAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: RBVAX (0.82) vs SSGSX (0.52). RBVAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RBVAX (4 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). RBVAX (37.04) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). RBVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). RBVAX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RBVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: RBVAX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). RBVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.67 vs. SSGSX (-14.61).
| RBVAX | SSGSX | RBVAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.26 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 37.04 | 1.26 | 2,940% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.380 | -13.720 | 98% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.5M | 5.33B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.52 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.67 | -14.61 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.39 | -16.35 | -8% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 23.96 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 2.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...